6 Comments
Mar 25Liked by Jean M. Twenge

The books and commentaries that claim we are pathologizing normal life experience continue to appear. My experience of 23 years in office practice of psychiatry did nothing to convince me that the worried well are being labeled and pushed into therapy offices. Of course being a psychiatrist perhaps I see only the worst cases. But conversations with my therapist colleagues lead me to the same conclusion.

I have also reviewed the data and spoken to researchers. It is undeniable that the frequency of common mental disorders has been rising in industrialized countries for decades. These disorders include depression, anxiety, and addiction disorders among others. Severe mental illness, such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, is not more common but does occur earlier in life, which predicts a more malignant course of illness.

If this data was about cancer, infections, nutrition, or metabolic disorders we'd be up in arms. When will we realize that mental illness is real and is more common in modern societies?

Expand full comment
Mar 27·edited Mar 27

Good commentary but I think we need to be careful to not make therapy binary "good or bad". There is enormous financial incentive for therapists to not completely see through healing. If a therapist or we as a community see improvement from therapy short of complete healing / full restoration I would caution celebrating this represents therapy "works". If we help someone go from a level 9 of depression to a level 6 requiring perpetual ongoing therapy and medication, when we / they have the capacity to get to a level 1 (requiring no further therapy or medication), we are enslaving patients not truly healing them.

Expand full comment

Interesting take. I will note however that Gen X (and Boomers too) were probably the most lead-poisoned generation (in infancy and early childhood) in modern history (only the ancient Romans were notoriously more so), more than any recent generation before or since. That was thanks to leaded gasoline, which was then phased out. According to Rick Nevin, whose life's work was to research the lead-crime hypothesis, that easily explains the elevated youth homicide, suicide, and teen pregnancy for Gen X. Throw in the late 1980s and early 1990s crack epidemic, and one can easily explain the trends better than the specious idea that Gen X had too much freedom and independence too soon.

Expand full comment